Clefable
On 1.1% of teams at all Elo. It wins 41.5% of games it is in the preview for, clearly below even, and ranks 165 of 172 ranked species on that measure.
Seen on the ladder
3,355 games brought1.6 moves shown per game56% showed an item4% showed an ability8% Mega Evolved
In the 3,355 games it was brought, it used Follow Me in 55% and Moonblast in 28%. The item seen most is Leftovers, in 21%.
Moves used
Items revealed
Abilities revealed
None revealed in 2% or more of its games.
Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.
All Elo
1.1% of teams53% brought25% lead6,477 teams
- On-team WR
- 41.595% CI 40.3–42.7 · n 6,379Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 43.995% CI 41.8–46.0 · n 2,164Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 38.895% CI 36.5–41.3 · n 1,584Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
Its side wins least against Farigiraf: 39.7% (CI 36.8–42.8, n 1,029). It does best against Indeedee-F, at 42.3%. Of 8 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against eight and clearly above against zero.
Opponents, hardest first
- Farigiraf39.7
- Sneasler40.1
- Kingambit40.5
- Rillaboom40.6
- Golisopod40.8
- Incineroar41.6
- Salamence42.0
- Indeedee-F42.3
On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 25% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Lucario, in 17% of its leads, and that lead wins 36.4% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Lucario36.4
- Delphox44.2
- Inteleon47.4
- Incineroar32.8
- Garchomp47.9
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.
Elo ≥ 1300
0.7% of teams44% brought21% lead850 teams
- On-team WR
- 46.0thin95% CI 42.7–49.4 · n 848Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 46.5thin95% CI 40.5–52.6 · n 258Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 42.0thin95% CI 35.0–49.4 · n 176Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 21% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Delphox, in 17% of its leads, and that lead wins 43.3% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Delphox43.3
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.